Monday, 11 April 2011

Fighting a losing battle.

Abu Kamara 

It is no secret that effective instructors, among the many things that make them great and effective, share a deep awareness of the importance of creating learning environments that have as their ends a fundamental preoccupation with empowerment and autonomy.  This awareness is illuminated by the simple understanding that in order for learning and teaching to be possible a precondition of respect is first necessary. In other words, both teachers and students must recognize one another's humanity. In Freirian terms, the teaching methodology cannot be one that is steeped in the ideology of a banking concept type education; it cannot be an atmosphere with a power dynamic that suppresses the recognition of students and instructors.  Above all else, it must be a liberating form of education that in addition to recognizing students and instructors as historical agents allows them to work together with the indispensable concepts of respect and collaboration as guides and life-long learning as a goal.

 Everyday, driven by the singular goal of educating their students, brave instructors spend countless hours outside the classroom researching, shaping and reshaping lesson plans. Even more impressive is the Herculean effort invested into the process of transforming complicated topics into accessible ideas. Given all the wonderful things instructors do to prepare students for their varied post high school and college roles, why the claim—they are fighting a losing battle.

With few exceptions, the sad truth is that currently the education system in North America does a very poor job of empowering students to become self-directed learners. Instead, students today depend on their instructors for everything. Of course, some dependency is inevitable but the type of dependency meant here is the one that makes students incapable of independently solving their own problems. It is not surprising then, given how accustomed students have become to extrinsic help, that there are widespread problems with critical thinking skills.  The biggest concern however is that with such a dependency students may find themselves lost in a market place that demands self-directed learning. Sadder still is the fact that there does not appear to be an end in sight, especially with the rapid growth of the knowledge economy continually yielding complicated problems that require fully developed life-long learning skills.  So, although enrollment continues to climb and the steady stream of graduating students continue to pour uninhabited out of the halls of higher ed, sings to some that may signify a robust and healthy higher education, the contention here is that students’ dependency on faculty members may have teachers fighting a losing battle when it comes to empowering students to become self-directed learners. 

Monday, 4 April 2011

Scarce support resources

Abu Kamara


 Something is rotten in the state of higher education-to use Marcellus words from Hamlet. On one hand, the internationalization of higher education has increased higher education enrollments all over North America and Europe and on the other hand it has exposed a persistent problem in higher education--that is the problem of scarce support resources. It is becoming more apparent that there are more students in higher education today than there are resources to support them. Large class sizes have further confounded this issue by expanding the responsibilities of faculty members without the appropriate development and modification of support infrastructures to support their teaching. Higher Ed. may have to revisit its current student support models or even exchange them for more creative and efficient ways of supporting students.